![]() |
IPEG Guidelines for Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) |
PREAMBLE/INTRODUCTIONGastroesophageal reflux is a common problem in infants and children. Physiologic vomiting is common in the first 6 months to one year of life. However, pathologic GERD can present in childhood. Pathologic GERD is the occurrence of reflux with associated complications that can include failure to thrive, aspiration, laryngospasm, and esophagitis (1). Treatment of GERD is initially medical with surgery employed for failure of medical management. The purpose of this document is to discuss the workup, medical and surgical treatment of GERD. |
|
DISCLAIMER Clinical practice guidelines are intended to indicate the best available approach to medical conditions as established by systematic review of available data and expert opinion. The approach suggested may not necessarily be the only acceptable approach given the complexity of the health care environment. These guidelines are intended to be flexible, as the physician must always choose the approach best suited to the individual patient and variables in existence at the moment of decision. These guidelines are applicable to all physicians who are appropriately credentialed and address the clinical situation in question, regardless of specialty. Guidelines are developed under the auspices of the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group Surgeons and its various committees, and approved by the Executive Committee. Each guideline is developed with a systematic approach, and includes review of the available literature and expert opinion when published data alone are insufficient to make recommendations. All guidelines undergo appropriate multidisciplinary review prior to publication, and recommendations are considered valid at the time of publication. Because new developments in medical research and practice can change recommendations, all guidelines undergo scheduled, periodic review to reflect any changes. The systematic development process of clinical practice guidelines began in 2007, and will be applied to all revisions as they come up for scheduled review, as well as all new guidelines. |
|
DEFINITION Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is the refluxing of gastric contents into the esophagus. This occurs in 50% of all infants from 0-3 months of age with emesis at least once daily (2). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is described as the clinical symptoms of GER and may be quite diverse and vary according to the age of the child. The infant and younger child usually presents with regurgitation, vomiting and irritability and the older child or adolescent with heartburn, epigastric/ substernal pain and dysphagia (3). The consequences of pathologic as opposed to physiologic GERD are complications including esophagitis, stricture, Barrett esophagus and pulmonary symptoms (4). Fundoplication is the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and consists of a partial (less than 360°) or complete wrap or plication (folding) of the fundus of the stomach around the esophagus. The surgery can be accomplished by traditional open techniques or by minimally invasive techniques. |
|
DIAGNOSIS AND WORKUP Patients are initially evaluated by clinical history and examination. Infants with reflux commonly present with regurgitation or vomiting (1,3-4). Other symptoms in infants include irritability and failure to thrive. Older children present with heartburn, epigastric pain and dysphagia3-4. GERD has been implicated in sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) or acute life threatening events (ALTE)(1). Children presenting with pathologic reflux should be evaluated with objective diagnostic examinations. A barium swallow is typically performed to evaluate for other causes of emesis. While this study is sensitive, it lacks specificity for determination of reflux (1,3). Esophageal pH monitoring is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of GER (1,3,5). pH monitoring is more helpful if the times of acid reflux correspond to symptoms, especially when symptoms are non gastrointestinal in nature (3). Esophageal pH monitoring gives information about the number of episodes of reflux with pH less than 4 as well as total time exposure to pH less than 4 and the length of the episodes (1,6-7). Gastric emptying studies (radio nuclide-labeled 99mTc sulfur colloid liquid or semisolid food) can assess for gastric emptying and has been used for measurement of reflux. Scintigraphy can measure both acid and nonacid reflux (7). The persistence of tracer in the chest at 24 hours can be suggestive of aspiration. Esophagoscopy has been recommended to look at the esophageal mucosa to determine mucosal injury from GERD (1, 7). Esophageal manometry measures the pressures in the esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter directly. This study however is used infrequently in children with GER (1). Intraluminal impedance monitoring (IMP) is a study using electrical impedance to record changes in the electrical impedance in the gastrointestinal lumen. The impedance devices use multiple channels, which can allow measurement of the direction of movement (8). Intraluminal impedance has been compared with pH monitoring with the IMP being more sensitive allowing detection of both acid and nonacid reflux episodes (5, 9-11). Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage can be performed in patients with reflux symptoms associated with presumed aspiration episodes. The bronchoalveolar lavage helps assess for the presence of neutrophils and lipid-laden macrophages in the aspirate, which would be consistent with aspiration from reflux (12). |
|
PATIENT SELECTION Selection of patients for surgery is reserved for patients with failure of medical management. Surgery is considered for the patient with esophagitis and stricture or Barrett esophagus (7). Other indications for selection of surgery are pulmonary symptoms, specifically asthma with persistent symptoms and reflux despite medical management and recurrent pneumonia associated with GER (7, 12). Antireflux surgery is also considered with failure or inadequate response to medical therapy associated with neurologic handicaps (13). The most common indications for antireflux surgery in the United States were failure to thrive, feeding disorders associated with reflux, respiratory symptoms associated with GER and esophagitis (14). |
|
RISKS OR POTENTIAL HAZARDS/BENEFITS Risks of medical management, which frequently includes proton pump inhibiters and histamine-2 receptor antagonists as well as prokinetics, are the side effects of the medications. For some patients, the medications may be short term but for many patients the length of medical treatment can be protracted (2, 7). When using H-2 receptor antagonists, there is an escape from the acid inhibitory mechanism after approximately 6 weeks (7). Metoclopramide efficacy is equivocal and has associated side effects including tardive dyskinesia (7). Thickening of feedings can be helpful in decreasing the symptoms of reflux and decreasing the acid reflux episodes. This treatment does not decrease the total number of reflux episodes when measured by impedance (2, 5). Longterm effects of nonacid reflux are not available. The risks of surgical procedures include both short-term and long-term complications. These include wound infections, herniations through abdominal incisions, gas-bloat syndrome, persistent dysphagia, dumping syndrome and recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (1,3,7). Other complications can include small bowel obstruction, pneumonia, perforation, persistent esophageal stricture, and esophageal obstruction (7). Outcomes can differ depending on the neurologic status of the child. Neurologically normal children tend to have fewer complications and to remain free of symptoms as opposed to neurologically impaired children (14). |
|
INDICATIONS Medical treatment and specifically formula changes and thickening feeds can be performed with clinical suspicion of GERD. Response to this therapy is sometimes considered evidence of the presence of GER (7). Use of medications including proton pump inhibitors generally require the confirmation of GER by an objective measure (2,7). Surgery is generally indicated when there is objective evidence of GER by one or more of the methods described in the diagnosis section such as pH monitoring, impedance monitoring, esophagoscopy, scinitigraphy demonstrating reflux. (1,2,7). In addition to the presence of GER and complications, the patients undergoing surgery have generally failed a trial of medical management as described above. |
|
CONTRAINDICATIONS Contraindications to medical management include persistent symptoms despite optimization of medication dosing and side effects of medication such as metoclopramide (1,7,14). Contraindications to operation are the lack of comorbidities and the lack of medical trials prior to surgery (7,14). |
|
TREATMENT AND OPTIONS Thickened feedings have been shown to decrease the number of acid reflux episodes and may relieve the symptoms of the infant with gastroesophageal reflux disease (2,5,7). Lifestyle changes in older children with the avoidance of caffeine, chocolate and spicy foods may be efficacious. In addition, weight loss may be helpful in obese children and the avoidance of exposure to tobacco smoke may be helpful (7). Surgical Options include both open and laparoscopic antireflux procedures. The antireflux operations may include partial or complete fundoplications. Nissen fundoplication was first described in 1954. The operation can be performed either open or laparoscopically with similar results and outcomes. The procedure is described as a repair of the esophageal hiatus after dissection with a plication of the fundus around the esophagus in a 360° fashion. Complications of the operation include dysphagia and gas-bloat. Recurrent reflux can occur in 1.7%-14% (1,15-19). Toupet fundoplication is a partial posterior 270° wrap. It is performed by closing the posterior hiatal opening and then suturing the fundus to the right crus and the right side of the esophagus and then suturing the left side of the fundus to the esohagophrenic ligament. The complications can include recurrence of reflux and less commonly dysphagia. Recurrence of reflux occurs in 2%-6.1% (1,20). Anterior partial wraps which include the Boix-Ochoa and the Thal can be performed open or laparoscopically. The Boix-Ochoa wrap involves an approximation of the right crural fibers followed by an anchoring of an anterior wrap to the anterior aspect of the esophagus and to the right crus and diaphragm. A Thal is performed by approximation of the hiatus posterior to the esophagus followed by a suture to fix the esophagus at that level posteriorly. The fundus is then sutured anteriorly with fixation to the esophagus and the diaphragm. Recurrence rates for these operation range from 5%-20% (21-23). Endoscopic approaches to treating GERD have been recently described. Of these, the Stretta procedure, using radiofrequency therapy of the lower esophageal area has been successfully used in adults and has been described in children. The treatment involves radiofrequency therapy of a 2-3 cm area of the lower esophagus and the cardia of the stomach. This creates a high pressure zone in that area and reduces reflux. This therapy can be repeated, and may be performed as an outpatient. It may also play a role in the setting of a failed fundoplication (24-25). Currently, the use of Stretta in children is based on Type III evidence. |
|
RECOMMENDATIONS Initial treatment of children with thickening of feeds has efficacy in improving symptoms of infants with GER. This may lead to persistent nonacid reflux but allows the child to be free of symptoms. This is supported by research done in the pediatric gastroenterology guidelines and in a placebo-controlled crossover trial (5,7). This evidence is a combination of type I and III. Diagnostic studies are recommended based on several types of evidence. The use of barium swallows, endoscopy and scintiscans are based on Type III evidence. The use of pH studies is based on Type II-2 and Type III data. The use of impedance studies is based on Type I data. Use of medications is supported by the pediatric gastroenterology group and by expert opinions. This should be performed with H-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors. The data for these therapies is described as Type I by the pediatric gastroenterology group (7). Surgical options are recommended only after failure of medical therapies. There are no randomized controlled trials of fundoplication versus medical therapy (7). Studies evaluating surgical treatment usually do not have controls. Most studies of laparoscopic antireflux surgery versus open antireflux surgery are non-randomized. There is no randomization of patients undergoing partial versus complete wraps but most studies suggest that the efficacy and complications are similar despite the type of procedure. Use of antireflux surgery can be recommended using Type II-3 evidence. The randomized trial of open versus laparoscopic Nissen revealed no difference in outcome based on inflammatory response. Laparoscopic fundoplications are safe and have similar outcomes compared to open fundoplications (1,12) The evidence to support the use of laparoscopic fundoplications is mostly Type II-3 and Type III. Type I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled study. Type II-1: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-controlled trials without randomization. Type II-2: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-controlled analytic studies, preferably from more than one center or research group. Type II-3: Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention. Type III: Opinions of respected authorities based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. |
|
POST-TREATMENT CARE Post-treatment care involved analgesia in the immediate postoperative period. The patient was then started on a diet or tube feeding and feeding was advanced until the child could be discharged. The child was then evaluated in the office after the procedure within the first few months of surgery. The evaluation was by clinical examination and history with testing reserved for patients with recurrence of symptoms (1, 26-32). |
|
COMPLICATIONS AND TREATMENT OF COMPLICATIONS Complications of surgery in the initial postoperative period are uncommon but include dysphagia and gas-bloat. For dysphagia, the child is kept on liquid and semisolid foods until the dysphagia resolves. This generally occurs by 6 months after the operation. (1,28). Bowel perforations can occur and these are treated by laparoscopic or open repair of the defect (17). Pneumonia postoperatively has been reported and is treated with antibiotics. Small bowel obstruction is treated with nasogastric decompression and with lysis of adhesions if nonoperative management does not resolve the obstruction (13). Stricture of the wrap and recurrent reflux may occur. The problems can be related to the crural closure, the wrap being too tight, sutures becoming loose. These can be treated nonoperatively at first. Tight wraps may be dilated on occasion. Medications can be resumed and if this fails, the wrap may be repeated either open or laparoscopically. When repeating the operation the choice of type of fundoplication may be changed (13,16-20,30-32). |
|
REFERENCES |
|
1. |
Chung DH and Georgeson KE. Fundoplication and Gastrostomy. Sem Ped Surg 1998; 7(4): 213-219. |
2. |
Craig WR, Hanlon-Dearman A, Sinclair C, Taback S, Moffatt M. Metoclopramide, thickened feedings, and positioning for gastro-oesophageal reflux in children under two years. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, The Cochrane Library, Copyright 2006, The Cochrane Collaboration Volume (1), 2006. |
3. |
Strople J and Kaul A. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease-current perspectives. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 2003;11: 447-451. |
4. |
Hassall E. Decisions in diagnosing and managing chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease in children. J. Pediatr, 2005; 146:S3-S12. |
5. |
Wenzl TG, Schneider S, Scheele F et al. Effects of thickened feeding on gastroesophageal reflux in infants: a placebo-controlled crossover study using intraluminal impedance. Pediatrics 2003; 111: e355-e359. |
6. |
Monteiro VRSG, Sdepanian VL, Weckx L, Fagundes-Neto U, Morais MB. Twenty-four hour esophageal pH monitoring in children and adolescents with chronic and/or recurrent rhinosinusitis. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2005; 38: 215-220. |
7. |
Rudolph C, Mazur LJ, Liptak GS, Baker, RD, Boyle JT, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children: Recommendations of the North American society for pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. J. Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2001; 32:S1-S31. |
8. |
Wenzl TG. Investigating esophageal reflux with the intraluminal impedance technique. J. Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002; 34: 261-268. |
9. |
Wenzl TG, Moroder C, Trachterna M, Thomson M, Silny J, et al. Esophageal pH monitoring and impedance measurement: A comparison of two diagnostic tests for gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002; 34: 519-523. |
10. |
Wenzl TG. Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux events in children using multichannel intraluminal electrical impedance. Am J Med. 2003; 115: 161S-165S. |
11. |
Skopnik H, Silny J, Heiber O, Schulz J, Rau G, Heimann G. Gastroesophageal reflux in infants: Evaluation of a new intraluminal impedance technique. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 1996; 23: 591-598. |
12. |
Mattioli G, Sacco O, Gentilino V, Martino F, Pini Prato A, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease and supraesophageal symptoms. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:463-465. |
13. |
Kawahara H, Okuyama H, Kubota A, Oue T, Tazuke Y, et al. Can laparoscopic antireflux surgery improve the quality of life in children with neurologic and neuromuscular handicaps? J Ped Surg 2004; 39: 1761-1764. |
14. |
Fonkulsrud EW, Ashcraft KW, Coran AG, Ellis DG, Grosfeld JL, et al. Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children: a combined hospital study of 7467 patients. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 419-422. |
15. |
Okuyama H, Kubota A, Kawahara H, Oue T, Yagi M. The efficacy and long-term outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in neurologically impaired children. Pediatr Endosurg & Innov Tech. 2004; 8:5-11. |
16. |
Liu D, Wynn A, Rodriguez JA, Hill CB & Loe WA. Laparoscopic Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication in children. Pediatric Endosurg & Innov Tech, 2001; 5:19-22. |
17. |
Rothenberg SS. Experience with 220 consecutive laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications in infants and children. J Ped Surg, 1998; 33: 274-278. |
18. |
Diaz DM, Gibbons TE, Heiss K, Wulkan ML, Ricketts RR & Gold BD. Antireflux surgery outcomes in pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am j Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1844-1852. |
19. |
Kimber C, Kiely EM, Spitz L. The failure rate of surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux. J Ped Surg 1998; 33: 64-66. |
20. |
Montoupet P, Mendoza-Sagaon M, De Dreuzy O, Roblot-Maigret B, Gauthier F. Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication in children. Pediatric Endosurg & Innov Tech, 2001;5:305-308. |
21. |
Subramaniam R and Dickson AP. Long-term outcome of Boix-Ochoa and Nissen fundoplication in normal and neurologically impaired children. J Ped Surg, 2000; 35:1214-1216. |
22. |
Martinez-Frontanilla LA, Sartorelli KH, Haase GM & Meagher DP. Laparoscopic Thal fundoplication with gastrostomy in children. J Ped Surg, 1996; 31:275-276. |
23. |
Hernandez-Orgaz A, Lopez-Alonso, M. Surgical treatment of the GER with Boix-Ochoa technique, long term results. Cir Pediatr 2004; 17: 122-124. |
24. |
Liu DC, Somme S, Mavrelis PG, et al. Stretta as the initial antireflux procedure in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40(1):148-51. |
25. |
Islam S, Geiger JD, Coran AG, Teitelbaum DH. Use of radiofrequency ablation of the lower esophageal sphincter to treat recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(3):282-6. |
26. |
Collins JB, Georgeson KE, Vicente Y, & Hardin WD. Comparison of open and laparoscopic gastrostomy and fundoplication in 120 patients. J. Ped Surg, 1995; 30: 1065-1071. |
27. |
McHoney M, Eaton S, Wade A, Klein NJ, Stefanutti G, et al. Inflammatory response in children after laparoscopic vs open Nissen fundoplication: randomized controlled trial. J Ped Surg, 2005; 40: 908-914. |
28. |
Mattioli G, Bax K, Becmeur F, Esposito C, Heloury Y, et al. European multicenter survey on the laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in patient aged less than 12 months with supraesophageal symptoms. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1309-1314. |
29. |
Powers C, Levitt MA, Tantoco J, Rossman J, Sarpel U, et al. The respiratory advantage of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Ped Surg, 2003; 38: 886-891. |
30. |
Esposito C, Montoupet P, Reinberg O. Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease during the first year of life. J Ped Surg 2001; 36: 715-717. |
31. |
Vecchia LKD, Grosfeld JL, West KW, Rescorla FJ, Scherer LR & Engum SA. Reoperation after Nissen fundoplication in children with gastroesophageal reflux: Experience with 130 patients. Ann Surg, 1997; 226: 315-323. |
32. |
Avansino JR, Lorenz ML, Hendrickson M, Jolley SG. Characterization and management of paraesophageal hernias in children after antireflux operation. J Ped Surg, 1999; 34:1610-1614. |
This Guideline was prepared by the IPEG Guidelines Committee and was reviewed and approved by the Executive Committee of the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) November, 2008. |
REQUESTS FOR REPRINTS SHOULD BE SENT TO: International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) Phone: +1-310-437-0553 |